Comments on: Eluana Englaro Dead

by: uggs on sale

Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:13:42 +0000

Thanks for sharing!Your articles it is wonderful!!

by: Grimshaw

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:46:59 +0100

Hello everyone. Anything looked at closely becomes wonderful.
I am from Malawi and learning to read in English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “Buy synthroid with confidence from an accredited online pharmacy and save! Place an order through a simple totally secure online ordering system or.”

Waiting for a reply , Grimshaw.

by: Thomas

Mon, 11 May 2009 21:24:35 +0100

Hi. In the future I’m going to keep here links to their sites. But I do not worry about the sites where my link is removed. So if you do not want to see a mountain of links, simply delete this message. After 2 weeks, I will come back and check.

by: Guest

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:30:32 +0100

The whole story is very sad. Emotionally thinking, I believe that they killed her. If I think rationally, I still feel disappointed that they had the right to do that. None of the arguments that are pro euthanasia, convince me, unless perhaps if the person really wishes to die. Still I don’t see why others would be allowed to put someone else to death. If she could talk, it’s very possible that she wouldn’t want to die, who knows. I also disagree with abortions.

by: kris

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:30:53 +0000

I have worked for 20 years for people with disabilities-primarily mental retardation. Some who cant walk,speak, feed themselves (and who have had feeding tubes), clothe themselves, and who require machines to stay alive or function. They bring so much quality to other’s lives, and when loved themselves, laughed, and enjoyed life. A friend just told me about one who could only communicate with his eyes. He was left in a crib in an institution for 10 years until someone talked to him and noticed he could communicate by blinking. I saw the tragic photo. Then i saw a photo taken of him as an adult surrounded by children with a big smile on his face. One I know does not appear to repsond to others but laughs and smiles and seems to appreciate life.Eluana was disabled just like them except with a different condition. Eluana was a living woman who had a condition. Her life had value, and no one had the right to take it from her. Felicia I am glad I am not your friend because God forbid I end up like Eluana you would have my food and water taken away. Eluana did not have a terminal condition and was not dying.

by: Fabio

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:10:41 +0000

To “another Italian woman”, post 40 : Leonardo David had his accident in 1979 (March 3rd, Lake Placid), but died February 26th, 1985. Eluana was then 15 years old.

by: another Italian woman

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:26:41 +0000

With reference to your last entry, I’d like to point out that the fact that Mr Englaro did not take the time to deny Mr Crisafulli’s statements certainly doesn’t make one lean towards Englaro’s version of the story. On the other hand, it is not in his interest to call attention to Mr Crisafulli’s words by denying them!
But I agree that we are probably the only ones still interested in this matter on this blog, because by now all this must be incomprehensible to the British. Yet the Englaro case is intended - by the “Transnational radicals” who are the real driving force behind it - to help spread the legalization of euthanasia all over the world, so the information we are sharing now may someday soon come in handy.
Best wishes.

by: Marta

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:36:17 +0000

Persistent vegetative state and permanent vegetative state are two different things.

Mr Crisafulli, as far as I know from the newspapers, can’t be defined “a good friend of Mr Englaro”. What I’ve read is that they met several times, because of their “common condition”. In the interviews I read, Mr Crisafulli declared “We met more than once, I have the pictures that can prove this”. In my personal opinion, this is not the comment of a good friend. As far as I know, after the accusation was made, Mr Englaro did not even take replied to them and they never met again.

But we monopolized this blog and apparently we are the only ones still interested in this matter. So, since the aim of a blog should be discussion with a plurality of people and I have no interest at all in trying to convince you (which I am sure is not possible, and I say so in the most respectful way), I will stop writing.

Best regards.

by: another Italian woman

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:07:12 +0000

BTW, Felicia, where did you get that part that says the Vatican “magnanimously announced that God will forgive Mr Englaro”? They did nothing of the sort, neither the Pope nor his spokesperson.

by: another Italian woman

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:00:00 +0000

As I re-read what I wrote I see what you mean, I guess it comes of trying to say so many things in one sentence. I didn’t mean to undermine Pietro Crisafulli’s credibility, quite the contrary.
In any case, anticipations this morning about the outcome of the autopsy have it that Eluana actually weighed 52 kilos, which is more like it.